Biro Jasa Konsultan ISO 9001 Berpengalaman di Tulungagung
Anda Mencari Biro Jasa Konsultan ISO 9001 Berpengalaman di Tulungagung Kami Solusinya Hubungi : 0857 1027 2813 konsultaniso9001.net adalah Jasa Konsultan ISO 9001, Consultant ISO 14001, Konsultan ISO 22000, OHSAS 18001, Penyusunan Dokumen CSMS-K3LL, K3, ISO/TS 16949,Dll yang BERANI memberikan JAMINAN KELULUSAN & MONEYBACK GUARANTEE ( Tanpa Terkecuali ) yang tertuang dalam kontrak kerja. Sebagai Konsultan ISO dan HSE TERBAIK dan BERPENGALAMAN kami siap membantu perusahaan bapak dan ibu dalam membangun sistem manajemen ISO dan HSE dengan pendekatan yang sistematis tanpa ribet dengan tujuan bagaimana sistem ISO tersebut bisa bermanfaat bagi perkembangan perusahaan serta menjadi pondasi yang kuat untuk kemajuan perusahaan.
Biro Jasa Konsultan ISO 9001 Berpengalaman di Tulungagung Melalui berbagai TRAINING ISO yang diselenggarakan menggunakan Metode Accelerated Learning, sehingga Karyawan Dipacu untuk lebih aktif dalam pembelajaran sehingga dapat menerapkan Sistem ini dengan Baik Nantinya. Biro Jasa Konsultan ISO 9001 Berpengalaman di Tulungagung
Jasa Sertifikasi ISO di Empat Lawang | Hubungi : 0857 1027 2813 PT Bintang Solusi Utama adalah Jasa Konsultan ISO 9001, Consultant ISO 14001, Konsultan ISO 22000, OHSAS 18001, Penyusunan Dokumen CSMS-K3LL, K3, ISO/TS 16949,Dll yang BERANI memberikan JAMINAN KELULUSAN & MONEYBACK GUARANTEE ( Tanpa Terkecuali ) yang tertuang dalam kontrak kerja. Sebagai Konsultan ISO dan HSE TERBAIK dan BERPENGALAMAN kami siap membantu perusahaan bapak dan ibu dalam membangun sistem manajemen ISO dan HSE dengan pendekatan yang sistematis tanpa ribet dengan tujuan bagaimana sistem ISO tersebut bisa bermanfaat bagi perkembangan perusahaan serta menjadi pondasi yang kuat untuk kemajuan perusahaan. Jasa Sertifikasi ISO di Empat Lawang
Kisah cinta dan cita-cita Desi, anak SMK penjual slondok
Saco-Indonesia.com - Sosok Desi Priharyana jadi sorotan. Murid kelas 1 SMKN 2 Yogyakarta itu membawa sepeda ontelnya yang dipasangi gerobak berisi aneka makanan ringan yang akan dijual.
Saco-Indonesia.com - Sosok Desi Priharyana jadi sorotan. Murid kelas 1 SMKN 2 Yogyakarta itu membawa sepeda ontelnya yang dipasangi gerobak berisi aneka makanan ringan yang akan dijual. Bersepeda sejauh 12 kilometer menjadi rutinitas paginya menuju sekolahnya yang terletak di Jalan AM Sangaji, Jetis, Yogyakarta.
Desi berjualan slondok, camilan tradisional Yogya yang terbuat dari singkong. Hal ini dilakukannya supaya bisa terus bersekolah.
Desi ingin menjadi seorang pengusaha yang sukses dibidang kuliner. Dia berniat untuk mengembangkan usahanya berjualan Slondok sehingga dia bisa mendapatkan keuntungan besar. Namun hal tersebut baru akan dilakukannya setelah dia menyelesaikan sekolahnya.
"Kalau sekarang waktunya belum ada, nanti kalau sudah lulus pengen saya kembangkan usaha ini," ujar Desi.
Meski demikian, Desi juga berharap, setelah lulus sekolah dia bisa melanjutkan ke perguruan tinggi negeri di Yogyakarta. Dia mengatakan, jika ada kesempatan untuk melanjutkan ke pendidikan lebih tinggi dia akan memilih UGM atau UNY sebagai tempatnya belajar.
"Kalau ada kesempatan pengen kuliah di UGM atau di UNY di fakultas Teknik, kalau nggak ya masih bisa buka usaha. Doakan bisa dapat beasiswa di sekolah, biar bisa nabung buat kuliah," harap Desi.
Laiknya anak muda yang sedang bergairah dalam urusan cinta, Desi pun tak mau kalah ketinggalan. Biarpun tidak sekeren anak-anak muda yang menggunakan sepeda motor dan dandanan modis, Desi tetap bisa memikat kekasih hatinya.
Dengan malu-malu Desi bercerita tentang kisah cintanya yang tergolong unik. Kala itu desi tengah mendekati seorang gadis yang merupakan atlet atletik. Saat Desi mengutarakan perasaannya dan meminta sang pujaan hati untuk menjadi pacaranya, Desi diberikan syarat.
"Dulu punya pacar, atlet atletik. Sebelum jadian dikasih syarat. Karena dia atlet dikasih syarat harus bisa kalahin dia lari, kalau bisa kalahin mau jadi pacar," kenang Desi.
Tanpa pikir panjang, Desi pun langsung menyanggupi syarat tersebut. Desi pun meminta waktu dua minggu untuk berlatih lari. Setelah dua minggu dilalui, dengan menggunakan sepedanya, Desi melaju dengan semangat dari Toino tempatnya tinggal menuju Kalasan yang jaraknya sekitar 20 kilo meter.
Sampai disana tanpa basa-basi Desi pun langsung mengajak adu lari. Beruntung, Desi memenangkan perlombaan itu sekaligus memenangkan hati pujaannya.
"Untungnya menang, jadi punya pacar," ungkapnya.
Meski demikian, Desi tidak mau disibukkan hanya untuk urusan pacaran. Desi beranggapan masa mudanya jauh lebih berarti jika digunakan untuk berkarya.
"Pacaran ya positif, tapi ada juga hal lain yang baik untuk menunjang masa depan," jelasnya.
Sumber : Merdeka.com
Editor : Maulana Lee
Benarkah jus buah dalam kemasan menyehatkan?
Saco-Indonesia.com - Di jaman yang serba modern dan orang-orangnya memiliki aktivitas segunung seperti saat ini, hal-hal yang praktis menjadi yang paling dicari untuk memenuhi kebutuhan.
Saco-Indonesia.com - Di jaman yang serba modern dan orang-orangnya memiliki aktivitas segunung seperti saat ini, hal-hal yang praktis menjadi yang paling dicari untuk memenuhi kebutuhan. Salah satunya ditunjukkan dengan semakin banyaknya produk-produk instan, terutama dalam hal makanan dan minuman.
Tak hanya vitamin yang dikemas praktis dalam bentuk suplemen, minuman seperti jus buah pun telah banyak diproduksi dalam kemasan. Hal ini tentu memudahkan karena tak membuat orang repot membuat jus buah sendiri dan bisa dikonsumsi sambil mengerjakan hal lainnya.
Namun, di balik semua kepraktisan yang ditawarkan oleh produk-produk minuman jus buah, apakah jus dalam kemasan tersebut cukup sehat untuk dikonsumsi? Kita tahu bahwa semua makanan kemasan pasti mengandung bahan pengawet. Bagaimana kita mengetahui bahwa jus tersebut dibuat dari buah asli dan nutrisi di dalamnya masih utuh?
Boldsky (18/03) memberikan beberapa cara untuk membantu Anda menentukan apakah jus buah kemasan yang Anda beli di swalayan cukup sehat untuk dikonsumsi dan membandingkannya dengan jus buah asli, berikut ini.
1. Baca labelnya
Semua jus buah kemasan pasti memiliki gambar buah-buahan segar di kemasannya. Namun jangan tertipu dengan gambar yang mengundang selera itu. Anda hanya perlu menemukan tulisan dalam kemasan tersebut. Pastikan dalam kemasan tersebut tertulis jelas "jus buah" dan bukannya "minuman buah." Jika yang Anda beli bertuliskan "minuman buah" sudah jelas yang ada di dalamnya bukan jus buah yang Anda harapkan.
2. Baca komposisi
Apa yang diharapkan seseorang ketika membeli jus buah kemasan? Mereka tentu berharap di dalamnya terdapat jus buah. Namun sayangnya tak semua jus buah kemasan semacam itu. Yang ada di dalamnya adalah air, konsentrat buah, dan penambah rasa yang akan memberikan rasa buah yang Anda inginkan. Belum lagi ditambah dengan mineral dan vitamin, serta tambahan pemanis buatan, sirup gula, dan pengawet.
3. Bandingkan rasa
Indera perasa manusia tak bisa berbohong. Lakukan tes sederhana untuk membandingkan rasa jus buah sungguhan yang Anda buat sendiri dengan jus buah kemasan yang Anda beli. Anda akan menyadari perbedaan rasa dari keduanya. Tinggal pilih mana yang paling Anda sukai.
4. Bandingkan masa kedaluwarsa
Berapa lama jus buah segar bisa bertahan lama? Tak lebih dari beberapa jam atau seharian. Bahkan faktanya, jus buah segar harus segera diminum dalam hitungan menit agar mendapatkan manfaat optimal di dalamnya. Sementara itu, jus buah kemasan bisa bertahan hingga sembilan bulan sampai satu tahun. Apakah mungkin jus buah kemasan ini asli? Anda sudah tahu jawabannya.
5. Cari bulir buah di dalamnya
Salah satu keunggulan jus buah yang asli adalah dari bulir buah yang ada di dalamnya. Tak ada jus buah kemasan yang mengandung bulir buah lebih banyak dari jus buah asli. Proses pengemasan jus buah akan mengambil semua manfaat kesehatan yang ada di dalamnya. Yang tersisa hanya kalori dan gula.
Poin-poin di atas sangat jelas dan bersifat mendasar. Semua orang tentu bisa mengerti mengapa jus buah kemasan tak lebih sehat dibandingkan dengan jus buah asli. Jika menginginkan manfaat terbaik dari buah, lebih baik pilih jus buah segar yang asli dibandingkan dengan kemasan. Akan lebih baik lagi jika Anda makan buah secara utuh, karena menjadikannya jus akan mengurangi nutrisi dan vitamin di dalamnya.
But an unusual assortment of players, including furniture makers, the Chinese government, Republicans from states with a large base of furniture manufacturing and even some Democrats who championed early regulatory efforts, have questioned the E.P.A. proposal. The sustained opposition has held sway, as the agency is now preparing to ease key testing requirements before it releases the landmark federal health standard.
The E.P.A.’s five-year effort to adopt this rule offers another example of how industry opposition can delay and hamper attempts by the federal government to issue regulations, even to control substances known to be harmful to human health.
Formaldehyde is a known carcinogen that can also cause respiratory ailments like asthma, but the potential of long-term exposure to cause cancers like myeloid leukemia is less well understood.
The E.P.A.’s decision would be the first time that the federal government has regulated formaldehyde inside most American homes.
“The stakes are high for public health,” said Tom Neltner, senior adviser for regulatory affairs at the National Center for Healthy Housing, who has closely monitored the debate over the rules. “What we can’t have here is an outcome that fails to confront the health threat we all know exists.”
The proposal would not ban formaldehyde — commonly used as an ingredient in wood glue in furniture and flooring — but it would impose rules that prevent dangerous levels of the chemical’s vapors from those products, and would set testing standards to ensure that products sold in the United States comply with those limits. The debate has sharpened in the face of growing concern about the safety of formaldehyde-treated flooring imported from Asia, especially China.
What is certain is that a lot of money is at stake: American companies sell billions of dollars’ worth of wood products each year that contain formaldehyde, and some argue that the proposed regulation would impose unfair costs and restrictions.
Determined to block the agency’s rule as proposed, these industry players have turned to the White House, members of Congress and top E.P.A. officials, pressing them to roll back the testing requirements in particular, calling them redundant and too expensive.
“There are potentially over a million manufacturing jobs that will be impacted if the proposed rule is finalized without changes,” wrote Bill Perdue, the chief lobbyist at the American Home Furnishings Alliance, a leading critic of the testing requirements in the proposed regulation, in one letter to the E.P.A.
Industry opposition helped create an odd alignment of forces working to thwart the rule. The White House moved to strike out key aspects of the proposal. Subsequent appeals for more changes were voiced by players as varied as Senator Barbara Boxer, Democrat of California, and Senator Roger Wicker, Republican of Mississippi, as well as furniture industry lobbyists.
Hurricane Katrina in 2005 helped ignite the public debate over formaldehyde, after the deadly storm destroyed or damaged hundreds of thousands of homes along the Gulf of Mexico, forcing families into temporary trailers provided by the Federal Emergency Management Agency.
The displaced storm victims quickly began reporting respiratory problems, burning eyes and other issues, and tests then confirmed high levels of formaldehyde fumes leaking into the air inside the trailers, which in many cases had been hastily constructed.
Public health advocates petitioned the E.P.A. to issue limits on formaldehyde in building materials and furniture used in homes, given that limits already existed for exposure in workplaces. But three years after the storm, only California had issued such limits.
Industry groups like the American Chemistry Council have repeatedly challenged the science linking formaldehyde to cancer, a position championed by David Vitter, the Republican senator from Louisiana, who is a major recipient of chemical industry campaign contributions, and whom environmental groups have mockingly nicknamed “Senator Formaldehyde.”
By 2010, public health advocates and some industry groups secured bipartisan support in Congress for legislation that ordered the E.P.A. to issue federal rules that largely mirrored California’s restrictions. At the time, concerns were rising over the growing number of lower-priced furniture imports from Asia that might include contaminated products, while also hurting sales of American-made products.
Maneuvering began almost immediately after the E.P.A. prepared draft rules to formally enact the new standards.
White House records show at least five meetings in mid-2012 with industry executives — kitchen cabinet makers, chemical manufacturers, furniture trade associations and their lobbyists, like Brock R. Landry, of the Venable law firm. These parties, along with Senator Vitter’s office, appealed to top administration officials, asking them to intervene to roll back the E.P.A. proposal.
The White House Office of Management and Budget, which reviews major federal regulations before they are adopted, apparently agreed. After the White House review, the E.P.A. “redlined” many of the estimates of the monetary benefits that would be gained by reductions in related health ailments, like asthma and fertility issues, documents reviewed by The New York Times show.
As a result, the estimated benefit of the proposed rule dropped to $48 million a year, from as much as $278 million a year. The much-reduced amount deeply weakened the agency’s justification for the sometimes costly new testing that would be required under the new rules, a federal official involved in the effort said.
“It’s a redlining blood bath,” said Lisa Heinzerling, a Georgetown University Law School professor and a former E.P.A. official, using the Washington phrase to describe when language is stricken from a proposed rule. “Almost the entire discussion of these potential benefits was excised.”
“That’s a huge difference,” said Luke Bolar, a spokesman for Mr. Vitter, of the reduced estimated financial benefits, saying the change was “clearly highlighting more mismanagement” at the E.P.A.
The review’s outcome galvanized opponents in the furniture industry. They then targeted a provision that mandated new testing of laminated wood, a cheaper alternative to hardwood. (The California standard on which the law was based did not require such testing.)
But E.P.A. scientists had concluded that these laminate products — millions of which are sold annually in the United States — posed a particular risk. They said that when thin layers of wood, also known as laminate or veneer, are added to furniture or flooring in the final stages of manufacturing, the resulting product can generate dangerous levels of fumes from often-used formaldehyde-based glues.
Industry executives, outraged by what they considered an unnecessary and financially burdensome level of testing, turned every lever within reach to get the requirement removed. It would be particularly onerous, they argued, for small manufacturers that would have to repeatedly interrupt their work to do expensive new testing. The E.P.A. estimated that the expanded requirements for laminate products would cost the furniture industry tens of millions of dollars annually, while the industry said that the proposed rule over all would cost its 7,000 American manufacturing facilities over $200 million each year.
“A lot of people don’t seem to appreciate what a lot of these requirements do to a small operation,” said Dick Titus, executive vice president of the Kitchen Cabinet Manufacturers Association, whose members are predominantly small businesses. “A 10-person shop, for example, just really isn’t equipped to handle that type of thing.”
Big industry players also weighed in. Executives from companies including La-Z-Boy, Hooker Furniture and Ashley Furniture all flew to Washington for a series of meetings with the offices of lawmakers including House Speaker John Boehner, Republican of Ohio, and about a dozen other lawmakers, asking several of them to sign a letter prepared by the industry to press the E.P.A. to back down, according to an industry report describing the lobbying visit.
The industry lobbyists also held their own meeting at E.P.A. headquarters, and they urged Jim Jones, who oversaw the rule-making process as the assistant administrator for the agency’s Office of Chemical Safety and Pollution Prevention, to visit a North Carolina furniture manufacturing plant. According to the trade group, Mr. Jones told them that the visit had “helped the agency shift its thinking” about the rules and how laminated products should be treated.
The resistance was particularly intense from lawmakers like Mr. Wicker of Mississippi, whose state is home to major manufacturing plants owned by Ashley Furniture Industries, the world’s largest furniture maker, and who is one of the biggest recipients in Congress of donations from the industry’s trade association. Asked if the political support played a role, a spokesman for Mr. Wicker replied: “Thousands of Mississippians depend on the furniture manufacturing industry for their livelihoods. Senator Wicker is committed to defending all Mississippians from government overreach.”
Individual companies like Ikea also intervened, as did the Chinese government, which claimed that the new rule would create a “great barrier” to the import of Chinese products because of higher costs.
Perhaps the most surprising objection came from Senator Boxer, of California, a longtime environmental advocate, whose office questioned why the E.P.A.’s rule went further than her home state’s in seeking testing on laminated products. “We did not advocate an outcome, other than safety,” her office said in a statement about why the senator raised concerns. “We said ‘Take a look to see if you have it right.’ ”
Safety advocates say that tighter restrictions — like the ones Ms. Boxer and Mr. Wicker, along with Representative Doris Matsui, a California Democrat, have questioned — are necessary, particularly for products coming from China, where items as varied as toys and Christmas lights have been found to violate American safety standards.
While Mr. Neltner, the environmental advocate who has been most involved in the review process, has been open to compromise, he has pressed the E.P.A. not to back down entirely, and to maintain a requirement that laminators verify that their products are safe.
An episode of CBS’s “60 Minutes” in March brought attention to the issue when it accused Lumber Liquidators, the discount flooring retailer, of selling laminate products with dangerous levels of formaldehyde. The company has disputed the show’s findings and test methods, maintaining that its products are safe.
“People think that just because Congress passed the legislation five years ago, the problem has been fixed,” said Becky Gillette, who then lived in coastal Mississippi, in the area hit by Hurricane Katrina, and was among the first to notice a pattern of complaints from people living in the trailers. “Real people’s faces and names come up in front of me when I think of the thousands of people who could get sick if this rule is not done right.”
An aide to Ms. Matsui rejected any suggestion that she was bending to industry pressure.
“From the beginning the public health has been our No. 1 concern,” said Kyle J. Victor, an aide to Ms. Matsui.
But further changes to the rule are likely, agency officials concede, as they say they are searching for a way to reduce the cost of complying with any final rule while maintaining public health goals. The question is just how radically the agency will revamp the testing requirement for laminated products — if it keeps it at all.
“It’s not a secret to anybody that is the most challenging issue,” said Mr. Jones, the E.P.A. official overseeing the process, adding that the health consequences from formaldehyde are real. “We have to reduce those exposures so that people can live healthy lives and not have to worry about being in their homes.”
Meet Mago, Former Heavyweight
GREENWICH, Conn. — Mago is in the bedroom. You can go in.
The big man lies on a hospital bed with his bare feet scraping its bottom rail. His head is propped on a scarlet pillow, the left temple dented, the right side paralyzed. His dark hair is kept just long enough to conceal the scars.
The occasional sounds he makes are understood only by his wife, but he still has that punctuating left hand. In slow motion, the fingers curl and close. A thumbs-up greeting.
This is Magomed Abdusalamov, 34, also known as the Russian Tyson, also known as Mago. He is a former heavyweight boxer who scored four knockouts and 14 technical knockouts in his first 18 professional fights. He preferred to stand between rounds. Sitting conveyed weakness.
But Mago lost his 19th fight, his big chance, at the packed Theater at Madison Square Garden in November 2013. His 19th decision, and his last.
Now here he is, in a small bedroom in a working-class neighborhood in Greenwich, in a modest house his family rents cheap from a devoted friend. The air-pressure machine for his mattress hums like an expectant crowd.
Today is like any other day, except for those days when he is hurried in crisis to the hospital. Every three hours during the night, his slight wife, Bakanay, 28, has risen to turn his 6-foot-3 body — 210 pounds of dead weight. It has to be done. Infections of the gaping bedsore above his tailbone have nearly killed him.
Then, with the help of a young caretaker, Baka has gotten two of their daughters off to elementary school and settled down the toddler. Yes, Mago and Baka are blessed with all girls, but they had also hoped for a son someday.
They feed Mago as they clean him; it’s easier that way. For breakfast, which comes with a side of crushed antiseizure pills, he likes oatmeal with a squirt of Hershey’s chocolate syrup. But even oatmeal must be puréed and fed to him by spoon.
He opens his mouth to indicate more, the way a baby does. But his paralysis has made everything a choking hazard. His water needs a stirring of powdered food thickener, and still he chokes — eh-eh-eh — as he tries to cough up what will not go down.
Mago used to drink only water. No alcohol. Not even soda. A sip of juice would be as far as he dared. Now even water betrays him.
With the caretaker’s help, Baka uses a washcloth and soap to clean his body and shampoo his hair. How handsome still, she has thought. Sometimes, in the night, she leaves the bedroom to watch old videos, just to hear again his voice in the fullness of life. She cries, wipes her eyes and returns, feigning happiness. Mago must never see her sad.
When Baka finishes, Mago is cleanshaven and fresh down to his trimmed and filed toenails. “I want him to look good,” she says.
Theirs was an arranged Muslim marriage in Makhachkala, in the Russian republic of Dagestan. He was 23, she was 18 and their future hinged on boxing. Sometimes they would shadowbox in love, her David to his Goliath. You are so strong, he would tell her.
His father once told him he could either be a bandit or an athlete, but if he chose banditry, “I will kill you.” This paternal advice, Mago later told The Ventura County Reporter, “made it a very easy decision for me.”
Mago won against mediocre competition, in Moscow and Hollywood, Fla., in Las Vegas and Johnstown, Pa. He was knocked down only once, and even then, it surprised more than hurt. He scored a technical knockout in the next round.
It all led up to this: the undercard at the Garden, Mike Perez vs. Magomed Abdusalamov, 10 rounds, on HBO. A win, he believed, would improve his chances of taking on the heavyweight champion Wladimir Klitschko, who sat in the crowd of 4,600 with his fiancée, the actress Hayden Panettiere, watching.
Wearing black-and-red trunks and a green mouth guard, Mago went to work. But in the first round, a hard forearm to his left cheek rocked him. At the bell, he returned to his corner, and this time, he sat down. “I think it’s broken,” he repeatedly said in Russian.
Maybe at that point, somebody — the referee, the ringside doctors, his handlers — should have stopped the fight, under a guiding principle: better one punch too early than one punch too late. But the bloody trade of blows continued into the seventh, eighth, ninth, a hand and orbital bone broken, his face transforming.
Meanwhile, in the family’s apartment in Miami, Baka forced herself to watch the broadcast. She could see it in his swollen eyes. Something was off.
After the final round, Perez raised his tattooed arms in victory, and Mago wandered off in a fog. He had taken 312 punches in about 40 minutes, for a purse of $40,000.
In the locker room, doctors sutured a cut above Mago’s left eye and tested his cognitive abilities. He did not do well. The ambulance that waits in expectation at every fight was not summoned by boxing officials.
Blood was pooling in Mago’s cranial cavity as he left the Garden. He vomited on the pavement while his handlers flagged a taxi to St. Luke’s-Roosevelt Hospital. There, doctors induced a coma and removed part of his skull to drain fluids and ease the swelling.
Then came the stroke.
It is lunchtime now, and the aroma of puréed beef and potatoes lingers. So do the questions.
How will Mago and Baka pay the $2 million in medical bills they owe? What if their friend can no longer offer them this home? Will they win their lawsuits against the five ringside doctors, the referee, and a New York State boxing inspector? What about Mago’s future care?
Most of all: Is this it?
A napkin rests on Mago’s chest. As another spoonful of mush approaches, he opens his mouth, half-swallows, chokes, and coughs until it clears. Eh-eh-eh. Sometimes he turns bluish, but Baka never shows fear. Always happy for Mago.
Some days he is wheeled out for physical therapy or speech therapy. Today, two massage therapists come to knead his half-limp body like a pair of skilled corner men.
Soon, Mago will doze. Then his three daughters, ages 2, 6 and 9, will descend upon him to talk of their day. Not long ago, the oldest lugged his championship belt to school for a proud show-and-tell moment. Her classmates were amazed at the weight of it.
Then, tonight, there will be more puréed food and pulverized medication, more coughing, and more tender care from his wife, before sleep comes.
He half-smiles, raises his one good hand, and forms a fist.